Applications

Aerospace

E175 aircraft

Aerodynamic shape design

We use an E175-based lift-constrained drag-minimization study as a capability test of the lab's differentiable surface-mesh deformation method. Rather than propose an E175 redesign, the demonstration asks whether full-configuration Euler CFD can remain coupled to a conforming volume mesh as planform, wing position, mounting angle, twist, camber, and tail rotation change.

Demonstrating mesh deformation inside MDO

The Mach-0.82 demonstration uses inviscid OpenFOAM Euler CFD with DAFoam sensitivities, about 100,000 triangular surface elements, and about 1.7 million tetrahedral volume cells. Elasticity-based volume-mesh deformation keeps the CFD mesh coupled as the 42 design variables change. The result is a capability demonstration, not a validated redesign of the E175.

Paper: Ruh and Hwang [1]

The E175 capability demonstration couples differentiable surface-mesh deformation to aircraft optimization under large geometry changes. [1] Source paper
Airfoil sections change with the wing twist and camber variables in the E175 optimization study. [1] Source paper
Pressure-coefficient distributions show the aerodynamic response evaluated as the E175 geometry changes. [1] Source paper

Optimization problem

Optimization formulation
Formulation element Euler CFD capability demonstration
CaseE175-based, single-subsonic-cruise lift-constrained drag minimization.
ObjectiveMinimize drag.
Design variables
Planform 6
Wing twist 3
Wing camber 30
Wing translation 1
Wing mounting angle 1
Tail rotation 1
Total design variables42
Constraints
Force balance 1
Moment balance 1
Total constraints2
Models and conditionsInviscid OpenFOAM Euler CFD (no viscous corrections) with DAFoam sensitivities; approximately 100,000 triangular surface elements and 1.7 million tetrahedral volume cells; elasticity-based volume-mesh deformation; component weight build-up equations; Mach 0.82.
Representative sourceUser-provided E175 CFD setup slide; published surface-mesh-deformation context: Ruh and Hwang (2026).
Source locatorUser-provided E175 CFD setup slide; the related published panel-model formulation is in Table 2, page 15.

References

  1. Marius L. Ruh, John T. Hwang. Surface Mesh Deformation for Large-Scale Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of Aircraft Concepts. AIAA AVIATION 2026 Forum, AIAA 2026-4569, 2026.
    PDF

Research connections

Related to E175 aircraft